![]() Original Subject Text somewhere, that's all right with me. msf file, be able to see that change when accessing my mail via my web-mailĬlient instead of via Mozilla (IMAP)? If you, for some reason, want to store the Not to mention that, one will loose all labelsĪssigned to mails before the manual edit.Ĭoncerning where to store the edited Subject Text the answer is simple - in the Something gets messed up and every mail is shown twice in the Mail Pane of the ![]() One has to exit Mozilla and reenter, otherwise Well, in Netscape one could switch to another folder during the edit, but in This was annoying in Netscape, in Mozilla even more. Mailing lists where mainly english is spoken/written. the Swedish "SV:" to the more common "Re:" which gets posted now an then to This would also be useful when for changing an "internationalized" Reply PrefixĮ.g. And to my knowledge this shouldn't affect ![]() Iĭon't see any reason to not allow this to be done via the Subject line of the Search for that particular mail and edit the subject back to it's original. "thread", and I thus have to manually open the Mail Folder with my Editor, This, of course, breaks the sorting of mails by Unfortunately this once in a while gets added to the subject line of mails that prepend "*** SPAM ***" to the subject line. Some of my mail forwarding services have started to "play" with spam Yesterday as Bug 229222 (and redirected to this thread).įor your convinience I include it here too: That has not been mentioned on this tread before, is the one that I reported Works like aĪnother, at least as I see it, rational reason to allow changing the subject, I've just verified that for all the six possibilities. ![]() None of the techniques above will become broken by changing the Subject Text of Prove that, then (s)he should choose to sign the message (or encrypt it), either "intellectual" contents of the message is not altered without being able to If the sender wants to safeguard that the Once a user has recieved a message, it's up to the user to decide what (s)he There is no technical one - at least none I'm aware Not been presented one single rational argument to not implement this during one The only blocker for this enhancement that I can see here is prestige. ![]() Know what else to do with their time? How hard can it be to realize the benefits Is this really a chat thread for developers or just time capitalists that don't ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |